THE POWER OF FOCUS
Like last week, in viewing movies back-to-back, it is inevitable to seek a common theme, and when that common theme is a driving force in each film, reflection is easy. This last week, viewing perhaps the two top contenders for the coveted Best Picture Oscar, I was definitely affected by the theme of Focus when I watched Spotlight and The Revenant. In one, the focus was pushing through the obstacles to expose the corruption in the institution of the diocese of the Catholic church; in the other, the focus was on pushing through the obstacles of nature and horrific physical injuries to seek revenge for the death of a son.
Like last week, in viewing movies back-to-back, it is inevitable to seek a common theme, and when that common theme is a driving force in each film, reflection is easy. This last week, viewing perhaps the two top contenders for the coveted Best Picture Oscar, I was definitely affected by the theme of Focus when I watched Spotlight and The Revenant. In one, the focus was pushing through the obstacles to expose the corruption in the institution of the diocese of the Catholic church; in the other, the focus was on pushing through the obstacles of nature and horrific physical injuries to seek revenge for the death of a son.
Spotlight is a
powerful and tightly written, acted, and directed film based on the true story
of how the Boston Globe uncovered the massive scandal of child molestation and
cover-up within the local Catholic Archdiocese. The ensemble performances are
such that to pull out one over the other is very difficult; you really feel
like you are a fly on the wall as these journalists from this team begin to
peel back the layers to this incredible horror. I think they did an exceptional
job of focusing on the institution and the factors at play in the cover-up and
not washing the entire Catholic church with the same brush, though at the end
you are left with a sick feeling as you wonder how deep this goes into the
history of this institution.
In a pivotal scene for me, I was left affected on many
levels as I watched the team take a phone call from a therapist who made this
his specialty. The camera begins tight on the team; they fill the screen. As
the conversation becomes more ‘weighty’, more exposing, and the number of
priests rise from 12 to 6% and the realization of what that means sinks in, the
camera slowly pulls back … the screen is no longer tight on the team, but they
are small parts on the right side of the picture, dwarfed by the rest of the
room. The weight of their realization became reflected in the weight of the
room on their backs and a nauseating feeling in the stomach of the viewer.
If I were to isolate a ‘Director’s Concept’ from this film
(a line on which every aspect of the entire film is hinged which is something I
do in every film I see), I would point to the line: “It takes a village to
raise a child. It takes a village to abuse one.” Not only does this point to
the depth of deception and collective participation uncovered, but also it
alludes to the good that the Catholic church did do in many cases. A beautiful
Christmas scene is given, the only one actually from inside a church (though
you see many old imposing cathedrals in various street scenes); a choir of
children singing carols, so tender and holy … and on the side, part of the
choir, 2 boys around the age of 12. The age for abuse, and you wonder.
I have to share one sobering reflection that has been
weighing on me since viewing this film. This is not something you will likely read in any other review, for it is something that came to me as I pondered the gravity of this film. One of the strong themes is about the
‘old boys club’, the historical significance of a small town and how everyone
is part of that culture and you don’t question or challenge. As the journalists
started to uncover this horror, as much as they were up against the cover-up
from the Catholic diocese, they also faced the pressure from the Boston culture
to not rock the boat. It’s not that bad. Look at all the good they’ve done. …
and I later chewed on watching an element of the same thinking play out on our
political playground today, in Alberta and Canada. I can’t help but wonder what
is going on when journalists, albeit of some legitimacy in some eyes, are
pressured into silence, when certain political voices are shut down, because
those in power “are not that bad, and look at the good they’ve done”, how we
are turning our backs on red flags because of an ‘old boys club’, or perhaps
‘political mindset club’ would be more politically correct.
I’ve used up most of this reflection on Spotlight, because
there is so much already in the media on The Revenant. The one-line summary of
this film states that it’s about Hugh Glass, played by Leo Dicaprio, a
frontiersman on a fur trading expedition in the 1820s as he fights for survival
after being mauled by a bear and left for dead by members of his own hunting
team. I will say that this is not a movie for everyone, and that the viewer
needs to have a measure of appreciation for a director like Inerratu. To say
that this is ‘his’ film is an understatement. The control he has over every
element you see in the screen (except for chinooks!), is quite amazing at
times, even if you find yourself groaning over another shot of trees. This is
his film, his baby, not ours; and he graces us in sharing his vision with us.
If we miss it or do not approve of it in some way, that is our problem, not
his. And, on some level, his dedication to this truth of his is to be
commended.
I said in the beginning that both of these movies are about
focus and this is almost ‘in-your-face’ in The Revenant. Focus on the
environment and scenery, some would say a third main character in the film,
beautiful and unforgiving at the same time; focus of John Fitzgerald on his
greed and self-survival, regardless of who is in his way; focus of Hugh Glass,
to overcome the bear mauling and being buried alive to get revenge on the man
who left him to die and killed his son (I cannot resist the urge to adapt a
quote from The Princess Bride – “Hello, I am Hugh Glass. You killed my son; prepare to
die!”), and all he went through on this quest. Humour aside, for it is not a funny film in any way, for as much fiction as was
inserted into the film in comparison to the Glass’s real story, apparently the
fact that there was a Hugh Glass, he was mauled horribly by a bear, buried
alive and left to die by Fitzgerald and managed somehow to travel over 200 miles
back to civilization in the 1820s frontier in this condition is truth. The
power of the human spirit is sometimes beyond comprehension!
An interesting piece to the understanding of this movie lies
in the title: The Revenant. It comes from the French verb ‘revenir’; and means
“a person who has returned, especially supposedly from the dead” and nowhere
else in the movie is this evident in amazing detail and power than when Glass
walks out of the ghostly trees in the middle of the night, backlit by fire
torches, camouflaged by snow and trees, an unbelievable apparition that
survived unimaginable obstacles.
I found The Revenant breath-taking and commanding on many
cinematic levels, but it was a difficult movie to watch. Leo DiCaprio spends a
great deal of the movie in silence, so the communication is left to his eyes.
As you become accustomed to watching his eyes, you also start to watch the
other eyes, and the stark contrast of raw emotion in Glass’s eyes, with the
dead, black eyes of Fitzgerald (played by Tom Hardy) often left chills down my
spine.
It is my thought that best picture will go to one of these
two films. I drove home pondering: of these eight movies, which is the best of
this year? Which gave us, the viewer, the best film possible? And I had a
feeling that it will be one of these two. Regardless of what the viewer thinks
of the work of Inerratu, of his obsession with trees and quirky artsy elements,
of long shots that almost leave you gasping for air, he is an obsessive
visionary but is not without strong competition. From a film point of view,
others, I think, were tighter, more direct, and maybe more powerful in their
own way … of which Spotlight possibly leads the pack.
I will reflect now on my thoughts for the main winners
on Sunday night and share them here this coming Saturday, Feb 27th. Please take a moment later to check back for my thoughts on this!
The Academy Awards air Sunday, February 28 at 6:30 on CTV.
If you’re interested: Canada’s etalk at the Oscars starts at 4:00 and Live from
the Red Carpet at 5:00, and who doesn’t like being an armchair critic to see
what is being worn by whom?
Spotlight Nominated For:
- Best Motion Picture of the Year
- Best Achievement in Directing: Tom McCarthy
- Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role: Mark Ruffalo
- Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role: Rachel McAdams
- Best Writing, Original Screenplay
- Best Achievement in Film Editing
The Revenant Nominated For:
- Best Motion Picture of the Year
- Best Achievement in Directing: Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu
- Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role: Leonardo DiCaprio
- Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role: Tom Hardy
- Best Achievement in Cinematography
- Best Achievement in Film Editing
- Best Achievement in Costume Design
- Best Achievement in Makeup and Hairstyling
- Best Achievement in Sound Mixing
- Best Achievement in Sound Editing
- Best Achievement in Visual Effects
- Best Achievement in Production Design


No comments:
Post a Comment